You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 3 Confidence in the relative risk of each comparison and outcome assessed by the GRADE system for short-term mortality and intubation

From: Association of noninvasive respiratory support with mortality and intubation rates in acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

  Risk of bias across studies Imprecision Heterogeneity Indirectness Publication bias Incoherence Confidence in relative risk of the event
Short-term mortality
 NPPV vs. COT Undetected Not serious
(95% CI 0.76-1.01)
Major concern a)
(95% PI 0.49-1.45)
Low Not suggested Major concernb
(p = 0.005)

Low
 HFNC vs. COT Undetected Not serious
(95% CI 0.80-1.08)
Major concern a)
(95% PI 0.45-1.47)
Low Not suggested Major concernb
(p = 0.031)

Low
 HFNC vs. NPPV Undetected Not serious
(95% CI 0.78-1.15)
Major concern a)
(95% PI 0.56-1.91)
Low Not suggested Major concernb
(p < 0.001)

Low
Intubation
 NPPV vs. COT Undetected Not serious
(95% CI 0.72-0.91)
Major concern a)
(95% PI 0.29-1.46)
Low Not suggested Major concernb
(p = 0.0035)

Low
 HFNC vs. COT Undetected Not serious
(95% CI 0.68-0.89)
Major concern a)
(95% PI 0.26-1.44)
Low Not suggested Major concernb
(p = 0.001)

Low
 HFNC vs. NPPV Undetected Not serious
(95% CI 0.88-1.22)
Major concern a)
(95% PI 0.45-2.49)
Low Not suggested Major concernb
(p < 0.001)

Low
  1. CI Confidence interval; COT Conventional oxygen therapy; HFNC High-flow nasal therapy; NPPV noninvasive positive pressure ventilation; PI Prediction interval
  2. a Prediction interval extends into clinically important effects in both directions.
  3. b P value of inconsistency was below 0.05.
\